Keenan 411

Jim Keenan is a Senior Sales Executive, Enterprise 2.0/Web 2.0 Connector, an Entrepreneur still trying to get it right, and a PSIA Certified Ski Instructor for Vail Resorts. Husband to Big E and father to four great kids. In a nut shell, I'm a Sales Guy. Life is good!

What are you looking for?

When leading a team, be careful what you are looking for. If you are looking to prove one of your sales managers doesn’t know his business you will find he doesn’t. If you are looking to show your Area Vice President doesn’t have the appropriate understanding of his cost of sales, that will be the case. If you are looking to show your sales team is lacking in product knowledge, you will be successful. If you have your mind made up it is easy to be right.

If you have a hunch or belief the team or member of the team is deficient in something you just may be right. Setting out to prove it will give you the validation you want but it doesn’t get you the truth.

To understand what is truly going on in your organization and with your team it is critical to ask questions; not leading questions or narrow questions, but broad, open questions. Assume your team knows the answers. Start from the positive. Ask lots of questions, dig deep, ask for specifics, challenge their assertions, push for more. Drilling down is good. It will give you the information you are looking for. It will validate or invalidate your assumptions. Doing it this way gives you the truth not just supports what you believe.

It’s too easy to draw conclusions about your team and organization. Many times these conclusions are based on limited data. When managing complex environments making good decisions is critical. The only thing better than making good decision is making the RIGHT decisions.

Ask questions, be open to the answers and put the assumptions away. I know it feels good to feel right, but it feels even better to BE right.

Twitter’s New Business Model

twitterThere has been a lot of chatter lately about Twitter and making money. Suggestions have ranged from creating a Brand subscription model to Jeremiah Owyang’s suggestion Twitter engage in CRM.

Despite the 35 million dollars in new capital, Twitter needs a business model and the time for Twitter to strike is now. Twitter has tremendous brand recognition and are riding a tremendous wave and there is a business model out there. I think Twitter is just looking in the wrong place. Twitter should be looking to the enterprise 2.0.

A huge transformation is occurring in enterprise communications. Voice, once the central component of enterprise communications is giving way to Email, IM and other non voice centric tools. Users no longer rely on just phone calls. Users now compartmentalize their communication choices. They effortlessly move between Voice, IM and Email through out the day, depending on their need. Voice is no longer at the core of business.

Companies are investing 100’s of millions of dollars to capitalize on this transformation. With Microsoft’s OCS 2007 R2, Cisco’s purchase of Jabber, and Avaya’s One X portfolio enterprise communication companies are scrambling to capture this transforming market called Unified Communications.

Unified Communications is quickly gaining momentum. Displacing Voice as the core way to communicate UC integrates; voice, email, IM, mobility, applications, conferencing, collaboration tools and more. UC seamlessly connects user communication. Twitter has a play here. Yammer and it’s competition Qikcom and Present.ly are quickly capturing a piece of this market. Yammer gets a dollar a user. This is a real business model. Twitter needs to flex it’s muscle and it’s brand recognition to penetrate this space.

The benefits are many;

1) They have the muscle, and brand recognition to quickly penetrate the market and take enterprise customers on quickly. It’s a real market with real dollars

2) Brands would be able to watch how their internal users use Twitter; gaining insight in how to leverage “Public” Twitter. This would increase Brand adoption on Twitter’s public platform

3) User adoption would accelerate as enterprise users familiar with Twitter in the workplace begin to adopt it for personal use

4) Twitter could leverage their enterprise relationships and platform to create new products and services, allowing Twitter to become a legitimate enterprise 2.0 as well as a web 2.0 company, creating scale and diversity.

The enterprise is changing rapidly. Softphones, IM, Email, integrated mobility services, collaboration are all quickly finding their way into users daily work flow and the enterprise version of Web 2.0 — Enterprise 2.0. The opportunity is now. Twitter would win by developing a secure version of it’s application. They should partner with MS, Avaya, and Cisco to integrate with their tools and establish themselves as an Enterprise 2.0 company.

The enterprise transformation is real. The difference between web 2.0 and enterprise 2.0 is real revenue. Companies are paying and Twitters cousin Yammer is collecting.

I’m headed to Voicecon this week. If I were Twitter I would be there.

Twitter has a legitimate chance to be the first true Web 2.0 crossover company . . . that is if they choose to be.

Sunday Morning Blog

My reading this Sunday Morning, Buzz Marketing for Technology. Paul Dunay is good at breaking down Web 2.0, Marketing, and Enterprise 2.0. His post C-Tweets was the inspiration for ExecTweets. He also has another great list Brands that Tweet. The word I would use to describe Buzz Marketing; INSIGHTFUL. Paul is also co-authoring Facebook for dummies. He’s has a great perspective.

Great Sunday Morning Blog!

Monday Morning Leadership

mondayam-meetings2With all that enters our lives, it’s easy to get sidetracked. Disruptions are thrown at us everyday. I thought Monday Morning Leadership’s concept of a the “Learning Zone”, was a good one to keep us on track.

“For you to be the very best, you cannot allow yourself to become complacent in your comfort zone. You need to be reaching for improvement. To fulfill your potential, you need to move out of your comfort zone and into the “learning zone.”"

The Learning Zone:

-Get out of your comfort zone
-Read 10 minutes a day (Relevant, Learning, Non-Fiction reading)
-Listen to people
-Give back
-Set goals
-Stay positive

When things are going well, I bet you could check off all of these. When things are going poorly, that may be a different story.

Reducing Supply

Seth Godin had a good post the other day about Executive compensation. He argued companies were so poor at marketing when searching for a CEO they defaulted to one tactic; pay. Like a sales guy discounting a deal because he can’t sell the benefits of the product. Companies increase salary to attract candidates, because the can’t adequately market the position.

I’m not sure I completely agree with Seth on this one. I think there is another aspect in play. Companies are afraid to hire wrong. The idea of hiring the wrong person is so crippling companies artificially reduce supply. With a potential of 100’s of capable candidates, organizations quickly reduce the list to a small “Who’s, Who” in the industry. The selection criteria has less to do with capabilities and more with status and name. Like big free-agent signings in professional sports, corporations throw big money at industry names .

Like the saying goes; “no one ever got fired for hiring IBM”. Board of Directors and the search committees are unwilling to be seen as having made a poor decision in such a high profile hiring. Therefore they hedge failure by securing the most measurable qualifications and hiring the candidate perceived to be the best choice by everyone else NOT in the hiring process. No one in the hiring process wants to have to defend their decision later.

To protect their reputations and avoid failure Boards artificially limit the supply of qualified candidates and in turn offer giant compensation packages to make sure their candidate doesn’t get away. If they do, they are left with few options.

Big money to CEO’s is more about fear of failure than it is about inability to attract and keep good talent. It’s supply and demand, except in this case supply is artificially reduced.

Doesn’t feel very market driven does it?

Good Ideas Finish Last

Great ideas are all around us. I would argue, great ideas are so prevalent they are a commodity. What makes a great idea go is it’s packaging. Great ideas require the perfect package to truly become great and creating a great package isn’t so easy.

ExecTweets, a new site, has been getting a lot of Buzz lately. ExecTweets aggregates the Twitters of Top CEO’s and executives.

What makes this story interesting is the list and idea for ExecTweets came from this blog which created the list back in Dec. 08.

To make a great idea go, create a great package. The Blog, Buzz Marketing for Technology had a great idea. It just didn’t have good packaging.

The “3″ Rule

Information flies at us at a 100 miles an hour. It seems almost impossible to keep up. There are blogs, twitter, facebook, TV, newspapers, Rss feeds, bookmarking sites like Digg and Delicious, Flickr, YouTube and more all designed to throw information at us at light speed.

Sorting through it all is daunting. Figuring out which new gadget you need to checkout, what new sites are critical to join, what new blogs to read etc will paralyze even the most organized.

To weed through it I’ve adopted the “3″ rule. The “3″ rule tells me when I should take notice something is happening and it is for real.

The “3″ rule is when I have been exposed to something 3 times. If I’ve read something, seen it on TV and heard someone I know talking about it then it’s the real deal and deserves my attention.

When a product, book, idea, site, movie, etc is part of the print conversation, (this includes the web and “print”) the television conversation and finally my personal network conversation, it’s time to take notice.

Problems, What Problems?

During difficult times, it is nice to have something to put things in perspective.

Monday Morning Leadership Quote:
mondayam-meetings1


“One of the nuggets of wisdom from an old friend that I will always remember is how to face problems and be positive., no mater the situation.

She loved to tell the story of how everyone could go to a field — about the size of a football field — and line up around the perimeter. While standing on the edge of the field, each person is given the opportunity to throw their problems into the middle of the field. One all the problems have been thrown in, you have your choice of which ones to pick up and take home. Most people will probably pick up their own problem and go back home, realizing that they really didn’t have it that bad after all.”

People, Product or Process

I’ve been talking to some of my peers about the economy and it’s getting more and more difficult out there. There has been a lot of conversation around lay-offs and downsizing. With revenues down, companies are doing what ever they can to remain profitable and survive. We’ve all had to do it and it’s no fun.

The stories are interesting and painful. Companies are laying off 5, 10, and even 20% of their organizations.

One of my peers was telling me that during his most recent layoff, people were let go who were integral to over 10 million dollars in new sales opportunities. In one case, his sales team is to present to a perspective client for a 6 million dollar deal this month and the key technical expert on the account was let go. At the time of this post he has yet to find a replacement. The most recent cuts at his company have put 10 million dollars in new sales at risk in an effort to save money. It doesn’t sound too prudent does it?

Organizations, like people, tend to lack creativity and objectivity when they are scared. No one is willing to take a risk and they have a tendency to see things for what they are. The spreadsheet takes over and if it can’t be measured, easily measured, no one pays attention to it.

While my friend and I were talking we got on the subject of how much work it is to close a deal at his company. The processes are cumbersome and time is wasted in non-selling activities. He was frustrated with the amount of work the processes entailed and how it negatively effected sales. With even less people, he is concerned its all just going to spiral out of control, more deals lost, more sales cuts, more revenue at risk, more deals lost, more people cuts etc. He was really concerned they were in a death spiral.

There are 3 main things that impact revenue and sales, product, people, and process. People get the most attention. When times are good, hire, hire, hire. When times are bad, fire, fire, fire. Unfortunately, you can’t not fire your way to survival. At times like these looking at the entire picture is critical. What products can you get rid of? What products are losing money. What are the costs associated with them? Find them and get rid of them. Streamline your product portfolio, make the tough choices and trim them down.

Process is the other area. Few organizations evaluate their existing processes to determine their cost. Processes have a cost, a real tangible cost. Figure out what the expensive processes in your organization are and fix them. My friend was telling me his sales people (these are high-end sales people making over 200k a yr.) spend hours a week hunting down 16k orders or filling out paper work for mailing $500 dollars worth of product. An organization that has high-end sales people spending hours a week on trivial efforts has processes costs that far exceed their people costs.

Getting lean, saving money and becoming efficient is critical during a down-time. Expense to Revenue management is critical. Cutting people is part of the process. However it is also the easiest. The good companies will look at more than just the people. They will get real with their organization and ferret out savings in product and process as well as people.

Eventually cutting people will cost you more than you save. My friend is very concerned. He thinks his company has cut too deep and will lose more than they save. If what he is telling me accurate, that he has over 10 million dollars in net new sales at risk due to the newest round of cuts . . . I think he’s right. His ship may be sinking.

Sunday Morning Blog

Today’s Sunday morning reading includes Information Arbitrage.

infoarbitrage

A great read on the economy, start ups, and finance. Roger Ehrenberg writes a good blog, and makes understanding this economic mess a bit easier. An “ex” Wall Street guy, he brings a unique perspective.

Information Arbitrage is a good read.

Keep Up With Me:


Categories