Keenan 411

Jim Keenan is a Senior Sales Executive, Enterprise 2.0/Web 2.0 Connector, an Entrepreneur still trying to get it right, and a PSIA Certified Ski Instructor for Vail Resorts. Husband to Big E and father to four great kids. In a nut shell, I'm a Sales Guy. Life is good!

Online Presence – Asset of the Future: Why Your Social Graph Will Be Worth as Much as Your Home

social-networking-image

The other day prolific blogger and VC Fred Wilson was at the gym. Frustrated with his ability to read the links in his Twitter stream, Fred twittered this-

“Is there a 3rd party Twitter app that builds a link page based on my follows? If not, someone should build it. It would be my start page”

With in a few days Fred received responses from a bunch of people who had built something based on his tweet. By the end of the week Fred had the custom app he was looking for.

I’ve watched this happen with Fred a couple of times. I’m seeing it a lot lately. People with large, authentic, followings are able to leverage those followings for tremendous gain. Watching this has made me realize a persons social graph, their number of followers, their social media reach is an asset, a HUGE ASSET!

Traditionally; homes, 401k’s, and cars are the most valuable personal assets of the average person. Looking forward, I see a persons social graph added to the list and possibly topping the list with the exception of the home.

In the not to distant future, a baseline online social presence will be required for the most common of lifes exercises, like getting a job. In the future, if you don’t have some semblance of an online presence you won’t even be considered for the job. If employers, or recruiters can’t learn about you online, through your social graph, they won’t be interested. I expect online vetting of dates, baby sitters, potential employees, etc. will only increase. Having an online social presence will be the required price to play.

If I am right and an authentic online social graph will be required to play, then a large, sweeping, highly engaging, informative, online social graph will be worth it’s followers in gold.

A strong online social graph allows us to do a lot of things.

Get help – On a couple of occasions, I’ve screwed up my blog. Each time I got stuck trying to fix, folks from within my social graph helped me out. People I’ve never met, in some cases they were people I never even knew were in my social graph, but were readers of this blog or followers of followers on Twitter.

Get Information – I watched Fred request and get help with a number things including; how to plot a power curve, do you know what a power curve is? Apparently some people do. Fred got what he needed.

Promotion – If Seth Godin points to a blog post, views of that post go through the roof. I recently watched the chatter about Socialcast, a Twitter for the enterprise company, blow up after A-List Blogger Chris Brogan mentioned his company was using and liking Socialcast. A strong online social presence exponentially grows your influence.

Ideas – Not sure what to do, how to attack a problem or need a spark of creativity, corraling the masses could make the difference. With a strong social graph collaboration is only a few key strokes away.

In the future, getting a job, raising money, promoting your e-book, getitng a seat at the exclusive restaurant, becoming the exclusive restaurant will be determined by the asset of the future, your online social graph.

Today Oprah, undoubtedly has the greatest reach in the world. Built by traditional media this reach is a real asset she leverages every week. She uses it to give her guests glamorous free gifts or turns uknown authors into overnight sensations. Traditionally, only those in media had reach. That’s changing. In the very near future everyone will have some level of reach. The question will no longer be do you have reach, but how much reach do you have?

Soon, how much money you have, the neighborhoods you live in, the jobs you get, the schools you attend, the friends you have, and your overall success or failure will directly correlate to your online social graph.

A social graph will be most peoples largest asset besides their home. It will have real value. It will have liquidity It will rise and fall in value.

The asset of the future will be your social graph. Have you started investing in it? You should be. Like most assets, the returns are much higher when you get in early.

UPDATE: I’m talking this topic to the next level and writing a book with Leslie Poston. Online Presence is going to be at the core of all of our social, professional and economical worlds. The book is going to breakdown why, and the impact of social media and the internet to our everyday lives. Check out Asset of the Future in the menu above.

Stay tuned, we’ll be sharing chapters, and bringing you along for the ride. It’s going to be fun.

Spread the Love:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed
  • This is an amazing discussion!

    So glad I found it from Paul Dunay's slideshare presentation on Facebook marketing.

    It makes me want to spend more quality time on social media sites because I now know the long-term value it will bring to me!

    Thank you so much.
  • Anthony,

    Paul has a great blog and some killer ideas. Things are changing,
    staying in front of them is a good idea.
  • Ed McCullough
    How do you convert your social graph into immediate cash?
  • Ed,

    Your online social graph isn't a short term or current asset. It's a
    long-term asset. Like that of your home. How much would value
    would you give it if it got you a job 50% faster than if you didn't
    have it. To measure the value of your online social graph, add up
    every time it created an opportunity that made you money, or saved you
    money.

    Ask a VC what his/her social graph is worth if it found them one of
    their portfolio companies that exited at 50 million. Ask a fledgling
    author what their social graph is worth when it helped promote and
    sell 250k copies of her first book. Ask the start up band, what their
    social graph is worth while they use it to sell 100's of CD's a week
    and sell out venues as they tour small clubs around the country. Ask
    the HR manager who got the Dir. job at a competitor because of the
    impressive posts she had on her blog.

    Our lives will go through our social graphs and online presence. How
    far you go can and will be measured in cash and opportunity.
  • Amitabh
    Hi! What you mentioned above is an accurate account of what 'will be'
    However, looking at the scenario today, I am trying to understand how much an expanded social network would really help in truly defining an individual, atleast as far as recruitments are concerned.
    The point is, even though a person may come with glowing recommendations through his/her social netwok, how do we test the reliability of the sources?
    Moreover, having followers is heavily dependent on certain parameters, say, the 'oprah' of bloggers would still have her own discretion in choosing who he/she wants to glorify. So this again turns from a 'merit only' proposition to a 'contacts only' one.
    I do agree that in certain sectors, like sales for example, this becomes necessary, but what about sectors like Technology and Healthcare, which require pure talent?

    A well construed introspection on matters of future opportunities requires an equivalent statement. Thanks for triggering the thought!!
  • Amitabh,

    I agree, an expanded social network, by itself doesn't define an
    individual. The concept is one's online presence in it's total,
    including blogs, group participations and other writings combined with
    their followers. It won't be acceptable for professionals in the
    future not to have some written presence such as a blog, wiki
    participation, group participation etc. This will create a living
    resume, giving recruiters and employers insight into the talent and
    capabilities of candidates.

    to your point technology and healthcare talent will be evaluated by
    their participation in groups, by blogs, etc. To compete we will need
    to express ourselves online to demonstrate our capabilities, similar
    to professors today.

    think of an online presence being all encompassing. Providing
    insight via, ones bog, followers on Twitter, Contacts on Linkedin,
    Friends on Facebook, comments on blogs, (care of disqus), and
    participation in groups. etc.

    Thanks for the insightful comment.
  • Great discussion - I love the terminology and the concept of active leveraging of presence (in a benign way) to illustrate influence.

    My question is, what will really determine that influence as the playing field does start to leverage. Right now it's still dominated by celebrity (Godin, Brogan both fall into that category, although probably an interesting comparison).

    Will it be a Social Media popularity contest? Is it a matter of finding and leading the tribe that's right for you, making it less about quantity and more about quality? Being genuine, playing nice, helping others - all of those things will be required, but what will put someone in the top 10 - 20 % of influence?

    Fun discussion.

    Shawn
  • Skinkade,

    Influence will be measured horizontally against peers within similar
    vertical groups. There will always be celebrity, however it's not
    about being the celebrity, it's about having a social graph one can
    leverage to improve their well being. Rather than a resume, a blog
    can provide tremendous insight to employers. If you have a crappy
    blog, with little substance and tons of followers, it won't help you
    as much as a great blog with powerful content and fewer followers.

    The same holds true for the number of followers. If you amass 1000
    authentic followers, and can get them to "respond" to requests and
    needs that will be far more valuable than 10,000 inauthentic followers
    who don't know you and aren't responsive to your engagement.

    The value of a social graph will be measured by how well you can use
    it to drive your life's purpose, career, dating, collaboration,
    information etc. It's closest to your statement of finding and
    leading or participating in a tribe or tribes thats right for you.
    You don't need to lead a tribe or be a Seth Godin to wield
    influence. Everyone will wield influence some more than others.
    Just like some people live in 10m dollar homes, some in 600k dollar
    homes and others in 200k dollar homes. Regardless of the size, almost
    everyone has a home. Everyone will have internet influence, how much
    one has will determine their life.
  • Yes, you're right, and really in a profoundly fundamental way.

    The "ownership" in the creation, promotion, and distribution of ideas, products, services is passing to the individual, "we the people," and away from "institutions." You can even say that the tools or means of creating wealth -- once "owned" by institutions, corporations, factories, facilities -- is now in the common domain -- ours, "for the people, by the people."

    The social web is democratizing the means of wealth. The new "factory" for creating wealth is on the Social Web. And through it, and how we are able to leverage the "inventory" of our connections, we generate financial value in the future.
  • Juan,

    It will be a dramatic cultural shift. How we build, use, manage, and
    leverage our social networks is fundamentally changing.
  • Jim: I think you are right on target with this post. Authentic followings are possible when you have something truly good to say. One of things that I have been thinking about is how we are trying to attract followings with Twitter. A short cut to coming up with remarkable content is to tweet out links to other people's content. I recently wrote about how web users are "owners" and they will tweet out content that will put them in a positive light within their social graph.

    Let me know what you think.

    http://christophermingryan.typepad.com/thewaywe...
  • Chris,

    Your post is spot one. I like how you use the term "ownership" for web advertising. The psychology is spot on. I'm not sure there is specific rhyme or reason on when and how people take ownership, but I do think it's critical for companies to start recognizing that there is a difference and getting their users to take "ownership" has a greater return.

    Thanks for pointing me to it. Good post.
  • I like the thoughts behind this post, especially the thought of your social leverage equalling the playing field. I'm a big believer in social leverage (in fact your statement about receiving help from followers of followers is one of the reasons behind the huge outcry against Twitter's decision to remove the opt in "see all @s" feature this week, but I digress). If you build your trust network well, putting in the effort it takes to grow the real friendships and connections that can sustain a growing network, you do find your life improved. Even more, you find that you are suddenly able to improve the lives and businesses of others by using your social leverage wisely. It's a good thing, and it is an asset of the present, not just the future.
  • Leslie,

    You've been working at this longer and better than most. Our
    relationship is an example of this

    I think it's only going to get more pervasive and more life altering.

    //keenan
  • Bernstyles
    By far, your most thought-provoking post... My primary concerns is around privacy and the implications of broadcasting every thought and action to a large and anonymous crowd.

    Things said within the context of a particular post could easily come back to haunt or harm. Youthful indiscretion and the inevitable slip-of-the tounge are bad enough, but magnify it by a huge social graph and you are potentially facing real, long-term consequences. I have at least one facebook aquaintence I had to block because I found their posts offensive. I now wonder what long-term impacts he will experience because of what he chose to say on the internet.
  • Bern,

    The transition to a social graph as an asset can and will be painful for some. However, as it becomes more common place people will be more deliberate in what they say and how they say it. An indiscretion or slip-of the tongue could have long-term consequences as the once invisible flash of greatness could also have long-term benefits.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Keep Up With Me:


Categories