Keenan 411

Coachability

Everyone has their own philosophy on hiring and what they determine to be the key skills in an employee.  The one that is most important to me is coachability.

Coachability is how flexible someone is.  It’s how well they respond to criticism, critique, new ways of doing things, and fresh ideas.   Coachability is a persons ability to grow through others leadership, direction, and insight.

Only 50% of sales people met their quota in 2009.  (source: Bridge Group’s 2010 inside sales metrics survey) I have to believe that many non sales people also missed their objectives and goals in 09.  I’m sure some of this can be attributed to the economy, but I also believe much of it is a leadership and people issue.

The only way to turn around an underperforming company, team or organization is through the people.  We only have two options when it comes to people; get new ones, or bring up the existing.   I prefer the second and that’s why I put so much emphasis on finding and hiring coachable people.

Coachable people embrace new ideas.  They are open and actively seek out criticism and critique.  They are often focused on personal development and growth.   Coachable people tend to be more secure.  They are less attached to the status-quo and see change as necessary and good.

Relationships with coachable employees are different too.  They are rooted in discussion, assessment and evaluation.  Relationships with coachable people are less hierarchical in nature.  I’ve found them to look and feel more like partners rather than supervisor, subordinate.   I’ve found when managing less coachable empolyees the conversations tend to be more combative, data driven, and defensive, as less coachable employees are very sensitive to criticism, and change.  They are often insecure and look to defend their position rather than explore new opportunities for growth.  Less coachable relationships are more hierarchical.  They are more top down.   I find it hard to work with less coachable people.

Coachabilty is a softskill.  It’s hard to measure.   But I know it when I see it.  Coachability is at the core of change.  It is at the core of growth.  It is at the core of personal interaction.  It is critical to development.   Coachable people bring a flexibility and openness to situations that enhances success.  I like to look at it like being a coach for a tennis or golf pro.  Imagine how difficult it would be to get Andre Agassi or Tiger Woods to win if they weren’t coachable.  Imagine every time you suggested a change in Tiger’s swing he argued or pushed back.  Imagine letting Andre know his performance in the first round of Wimbledon was awful and that he wasn’t playing well, and he’d complain to “HR”.

The coachable get that being pushed, challenged, and coached is the key to their success.  They actively seek it out and surround themselves with coaches that don’t let them get complacent.  I believe the same thing holds true in the business world.

There are a lot of brilliant, talented, experienced, people out there.  People with amazing skills who can get things done.  But for me, more important than experience, talent, and brilliance is their ability to adapt and grow and the coachable are far more capable of growing and adapting.

Business changes faster than it ever did.  Companies are no longer entitled to a 100 year span on top.  Microsoft, less than 30 years old is now loosing to Apple.  Google, only 10 years old is being challenged by Facebook.   Adaptability is the new success trait.   To be adaptable you have to be flexible and a team of coachable engineers, sales people, product people, marketers and more is at the core of that flexibility.

For me, hiring coachable people has been the difference between success and failure.   What do you think?

Enhanced by Zemanta
Spread the Love:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • FriendFeed

View Comments

  1. 1

    Would you say that you are coachable? A coach?

    Comment by Shane Mac — July 7, 2010 @ 5:01 pm

  2. 2

    I am definitely a coach. Coachable, I'd like to think I am. I can be passionate about my ideas, at the same time, I seek out feedback.

    Comment by Keenan — July 7, 2010 @ 5:10 pm

  3. 3

    Good thoughts, Keenan. I'm a sales person that is rather new to my company right now. Learning a new system and especially the new industry that I'm in now is a real challenge. I've learned that keeping an open mind and being ok with “falling forward” are part of the process. This post really challenged me to think about my demeanor toward learning my craft.

    JB

    Comment by jaqbaldwin — July 7, 2010 @ 8:59 pm

  4. 4

    Keep that open mind, find a good coach, listen to them, then . . . make your own decisions.

    Comment by Keenan — July 7, 2010 @ 9:18 pm

  5. 5

    Great post Jim, I was also noticing the comments–which provoked me to comment. Great managers need to both coach and be coachable. (and you are very coachable ;)

    We do face a real challenge, hiring people that are coachable is great, but they need to get the right coaching. Too few managers invest the time in coaching or coach effectively.

    While the data is a few years old, we did a survey of several 100 sales managers a few year ago. One question was, “How frequently do you coach each sales person?” The response astounded us, 68% coached their sales people once a quarter or less.

    Managers don't understand coaching and don't integrate coaching into the fabric of the business. To drive high performance, it's critical to have coachable people, but it's as critical to coach them!

    Great post!

    Comment by Dave Brock — July 8, 2010 @ 1:10 pm

  6. 6

    Well said David. You're thoughts deserve a post of their own. Completely agree. I'll do a follow up on coaching as well.

    A coachable person without a coach is a waste.

    Comment by Keenan — July 8, 2010 @ 3:52 pm

  7. 7

    Enjoyed your post. Coachability is important, no doubt. Being able to listen…. and for the manager being able to communicate.
    That stat that “50% of salespeople didn't make their quota” always gets me, though. Ten years ago, when I found myself running a 200 person sales team I looked at the numbers, too. And realized that half of my salespeople should never have been hired.
    We started paying a lot more attention to how we hired salespeople. Slowly we worked our numbers up by bringing better people in from the beginning. It made it a lot easier, even though we had to create a sales hiring system from scratch.

    Comment by Alan Fendrich — July 8, 2010 @ 6:01 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Keep Up With Me:


Categories

  • Asset of The Future (24)
  • Business Performance (118)
  • Career Development (33)
  • Customer Service (38)
  • Economy (10)
  • Enterprise 2.0 (22)
  • Entrepreneur (16)
  • Hiring/Firing (23)
  • Leadership (101)
  • Marketing (17)
  • My Reading Quotes (8)
  • Personal Brand (27)
  • Personal Development (75)
  • Politics (12)
  • Random (48)
  • Sales Process (71)
  • Skiing (5)
  • Strategy (2)
  • Sunday Morning Blog (18)
  • TalkShoe Events (5)
  • Technology and Products (7)
  • The Chase (104)
  • To the Community (1)
  • Uncategorized (63)
  • Web 2.0/Social Networking (78)
  • What I Think! (133)